Monday, November 24, 2014

Is Obama Deliberately Using the “ISIS Crisis” to Forge an Alliance With Iran?

By Trevor Loudon
Image Net

The world communist press has been pushing  an American/Iranian “rapprochement” for some time now.

Navid Shomali,   secretary of  Iran’s communist  Tudeh Party’s international department, recently wrote;
The Tudeh Party of Iran supports any lowering of tension between the U.S. and Iran. It has called for years for all disputes to be resolved by negotiation in accordance with international law.
Savvy commentators like Washington DC based Michael Ledeen have been warning of President Obama’s plans for nothing less than a full fledged US/Iran alliance.

Now comes further indication of the President’s intentions, from one of the Communist Party USA‘s best friends in Congress, Washington State Rep. Jim McDermott. Long tied to Washington Communist Party identities such as Pat Stell, and the late Will Parry, McDermott is a very reliable guide to communist thinking, and strategy.
I’ve always said that if you want to know what long time *Communist Party “friend” Barack Obama will do tomorrow – read the communist press today.
In a recent speech on the floor of Congress, published in full, in the Communist Party’s Peoples World, Rep. McDermott lays out  the communist agenda,  and selling points towards a US/Iranian detente, and eventual formal alliance.
Read More@Trevor Loudon

Giuliani Explodes over Black Crime: Wouldn’t Need White Cops ‘If You Weren’t Killing Each Other’ Debate with MSNBC contributor Michael Eric Dyson,


And another thing about that Benghazi Report…

by Noah Rothman
Image SHAW

The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence’s final report on the 2012 Benghazi attack has restored the left’s swagger. The report, from which a variety of news organizations are deriving the headline “No intelligence failure in Benghazi attack,largely exonerates the CIA for their role in that deadly attack and clears the White House of the charge that it intentionally misled the public in the days and weeks following that attack.
“House Republicans have insisted that it is a conspiracy,” Rachel Maddow said after throwing out the rundown on Friday to indulge her audience’s egos. “President Obama must have wanted those Americans to be killed. Hillary Clinton somehow ensured that they would be killed. It’s all some sort of crazy cover up.”
How crude.

Writing for Mother Jones, the slightly more thoughtful liberal Kevin Drum fulfilled his desire to indulge in self-congratulations with a touch less condescension. “Their exoneration of the White House was sweeping and nearly absolute,
” Drum wrote of the HPSCI’s report. “Late on a Friday afternoon, when it would get the least attention, a Republican-led committee finally admitted that every single Benghazi conspiracy theory was false.
Read More@Hot Air

Chuck Todd: Republicans Are Toxic and Confused After Obama’s Executive Action, video


Chuck Todd, NBC News Political Director and moderator of Meet the Press, appeared on Sunday’s Today to preview his show and had some harsh words for Republicans in the wake of President Obama’s executive action on immigration.

Speaking to co-host Erica Hill, Todd argued that “politically on Capitol Hill it’s very toxic. I think congressional Republicans they are united on one issue, they don't like how the president went about doing this. But after that, they don't quite know how to retaliate politically.”

The segment began with Hill pointing out how “there has been heavy Republican opposition and the most recent NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll shows Americans aren't exactly behind the president either. 48 percent are opposed to president taking executive action on immigration. Just 38 percent support it.”  

After Hill’s comments, Todd went into spin mode and insisted that the American public is actually behind the president’s actions but the GOP has created a toxic environment in Washington:
It’s actually unclear and congressional leaders, Republican leaders don't want to go anywhere near the idea of a government shutdown. They think politically that would be toxic. At this point they could pass a bill but can't unite the party around any single bill. 
And by the way, the policy the president is implementing is actually not unpopular. It’s just how he went about doing it that is unpopular. That adds to the confusion of how Republicans should respond.
Read More@MRC

Explaining Away Obama

 By Victor Davis Hanson

The only mystery about the last six years is how much lasting damage has been done to the American experiment, at home and abroad. Our federal agencies are now an alphabet soup of incompetence and corruption. How does the IRS ever quite recover? Will the Secret Service always be seen as veritable Keystone Cops?

Is the GSA now a reckless party-time organization? Is the EPA institutionalized as a rogue appendage of the radical green movement with a director who dabbles in online pseudonyms?
Do we accept that the Justice Department dispenses injustice or that the VA can be a lethal institution for our patriots? Is NASA now a Muslim outreach megaphone as we hire Russia, the loser of the space race, to rocket us into orbit?

Will anyone again ever believe a U.S. red line, step-over line, or deadline? 
Will Iran ever accept that it should not have a bomb or fear the consequences of trying to get one? 
Is Iraq (omnis effusus labor) a sort of rescued Eurydice that was abruptly lost on the trek up from the Underworld? Will Afghanistan become Saigon, 1975?
How could Putin ever again be worried about offending a U.S. president, or could China or North Korea? Are we now always to be allies of Islamist Turkey and indifferent to its enemies like our once-allied Kurds, Cypriots, Greeks, and Israelis?
Will the economy ever again grow as it should? Will disability, food stamp, and welfare recipients jump back into the workforce should we frack on federal lands, build the Keystone pipeline or quit berating private enterprise?

Every statistic that Obama has produced on Obamacare enrollment, deportation, unemployment and GDP growth is in some ways a lie. Almost everything he has said about granting amnesty was untrue, from *his own contradictions to the congressionally sanctioned small amnesties of prior presidents. Almost every time Obama steps to the lectern we expect two things: he will lecture us on our moral failings and what he will say will be abjectly untrue.

Read More@PJMedia

Amnesty for UnAmerica

By Daniel Greenfield

Obama’s excuse for his illegal amnesty will be that the immigration system is “broken” forcing him to act. But when Obama says that the system is broken, he means that some parts of it still work and so he intends to break immigration all the way through to benefit his own corrupt political allies.

That will hurt his own voters the most, but the Democratic Party has a notoriously masochistic relationship with its voting base. It beats them up and then it gaslights them by hugging them and telling them that it was really the mean Republicans who punched them in the face.

When African-American unemployment rates rise, the workers who can’t find jobs because of all the brand new DREAMERs won’t blame the White House, they’ll blame the evil Republicans for income inequality, assuming Sharpton manages to read the term correctly from his MSNBC teleprompter.
According to Obama our immigration system is broken because it doesn’t allow illegal aliens who illegally crossed the border to take American jobs. That’s not a broken system, that’s what the system is supposed to do. 
Read More@SultanKnish

Sunday, November 23, 2014

VIDEO--Sen. Lindsey Graham blasts new Benghazi Report - calls it "full of crap"


'We Will Not Engage': Michele Bachmann Reveals GOP Plans to IGNORE Executive Amnesty

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn) revealed on Saturday that Republican leadership, led by Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-Oh), has no intention of resisting President Obama’s executive amnesty that he ordered on Thursday.
Breitbart News Executive Chairman Steven K. Bannon asked the congresswoman, who was a guest on Breitbart News Saturday Sirius XM Patriot channel 125, “Has there been any firm commitment from the leadership of the Republican party saying that this amnesty is not going to happen?

Bachmann replied with a question, “Do you want the truth? Okay, I’ll tell all of Breitbart listeners what happened this week. I was floored!”

In the weekly meeting called “Republican Conference” in the House of Representatives, “we all knew that the big issue for the week was going to be the president announcing his amnesty,” she explained. Bachmann recounted that all of the leadership went to the microphone, including John Boehner.
“They acted as though the amnesty issue wasn’t even an issue. They said that the President is going to do what he’s going to do, and we are not going to get down in the mud with him. We are not going to engage, and what we are going to do is to talk about our positive solutions on jobs, the economy, education, and manufacturing,” Bachmann said. 
She added that each congressman who spoke reiterated that not engaging Obama and staying positive was a “brilliant strategy.”
"We will not engage," she reiterated with disgust.

Bachmann, who was elected to Congress in 2006 and is ending her service this year, is stupefied by the Republican leadership not taking action or having a plan. “While the country is talking about amnesty, and the president is taking unconstitutional actions, our leadership wants to change the subject and not engage,” she said.

Bannon said he was “stunned” that, on the walk-up to a day that is going to go down as “one of the most important days in constitutional history,” there was no pre existing plan or course of action by the GOP. The Congresswoman asserts that Boehner and the leadership “think that the smarter strategy is to not engage.”

Earlier in the broadcast, co-host and Breitbart News Editor-in-Chief Alex Marlow said that, after reading Breitbart News’ *report on Friday about Republicans flying out of town after Obama’s speech without devising a plan, is evidence that "the Republican establishment doesn't care about Obama passing executive amnesty.”
Read More@Breitbart

Obama's Amnesty and the Democrats’ War on Black Americans

By Lee Cary
Image SHAW

Obama’s proclamation of amnesty to illegal aliens is just the latest step in a long-running war conducted by Democrats against American citizens of African descent.

But, there are early signs that the African-American community is waking up to the decades-long, false claim by Democrats, heralded since the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as being the political party most concerned with the condition of Blacks.

Obama’s dictatorial edict granting functional amnesty to millions of Hispanic illegal immigrants is not being well-received by some African-Americans who feel betrayed by the first Black President.
Perhaps now they’ll pause to glance back over the last 50 years and compare Democrat promises made to the “Black community” – in exchange for their votes – against historical outcomes in the freedoms generously bestowed by Democrats on African-Americans.
The Freedoms to be the Lowest Paid, and Most Unemployed & Impoverished Americans
In August 2013, a Washington Post article – not a FOX News piece – listed economic factors among Blacks in an article entitled,

These ten charts show the black-white economic gap hasn’t budged in 50 years.” The list includes:

“The black unemployment rate has consistently been twice as high as the white unemployment rate for 50 years.”
For the past 50 years, black unemployment has been well above recession levels.”
The gap in household income between blacks and whites hasn’t narrowed in the last 50 years.”
“In fact, the wealth disparity between whites and blacks grew even wider during the Great Recession.”
“The black poverty rate is no longer declining.”
Black children are far more likely than whites to live in areas of concentrated poverty.”
Our schools are more segregated today than in 1980.”

Tucker Carlson Takes On Geraldo Rivera Over Obama’s Amnesty [VIDEO]

 By AGriswold

Friday on “Fox and Friends,” Fox News journalist Geraldo Rivera said that President Barack Obama’s executive amnesty was justified as a “leveling of the field,” since the immigration system has historically discriminated against Latinos.

Rivera got into a heated debate with The Daily Caller’s Tucker Carlson. While Rivera was “delighted” that an estimated five million illegal immigrants would be able to “come out of the shadows,” Carlson was more concerned about American workers who could see their wages undercut.
“Please understand that the immigration system has for generations been skewed,” Rivera said. ”First it was designed to be anti-Chinese. Then it was designed to be anti-Southern European. Then it was never an Ellis Island for Latinos. You have to understand that they are trying to make up ground.
 (RELATED: Dem Rep: Republicans Wants To Use ‘Xenophobia’ And ‘Bigotry’ Against Latinos [VIDEO])

“There has been — and everyone admits it, and I hate to raise a flag that says racial preference or anything like that — but there is clear history that we wanted Northern Europeans, we didn’t want southern Europeans, we definitely didn’t want Africans or Chinese or South Asia
DailyCaller   VIDEO HERE

Report Questions Role of Wealth in Sandy Hook Shooter's Care


A new report asks whether the race and affluence of Adam Lanza's family influenced decisions about how to care for his mental health problems in the years before he committed the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre.

Among the findings in the report, which was released Friday by the state office of Child Advocate, is that Lanza's his parents and educators contributed to his social isolation by accommodating ? and not confronting -- his difficulties engaging with the world.

The report said recommendations from Yale psychologists that he be medicated and undergo rigorous treatment as a child for anxiety and other conditions were rejected by his mother, who eventually took him out of school.
"Is the community more reluctant to intervene and more likely to provide deference to the parental judgment and decision-making of white, affluent parents than those caregivers who are poor or minority?" the report asks. "Would (Adam Lanza's) caregivers' reluctance to maintain him in school or a treatment program have gone under the radar if he were a child of color?"
Lanza's father is a financial services executive. The son and his mother lived in an exclusive neighborhood in the wealthy bedroom community, 70 miles north of Manhattan.

Research has found that upper-middle-class parents are far more likely to be resistant, defensive and even litigious when presented with treatment options suggested by school service providers, said Suniya Luthar, a professor of Psychology at Arizona State University, who has written extensively on the topic of affluence and mental health.

Deferring to those parents can have grave consequences, allowing nascent problems to escalate to serious and sometimes dangerous levels, she said.
"Even though some of these parents can be very intimidating, schools need to hang tough," she said.
"If there is a psychologist, a teacher or a social worker who believes this child is headed for deep trouble, they need to be firm in advocating for the child"
The report concluded that Lanza's autism spectrum disorder and other psychiatric problems did not cause or lead directly to the massacre.

Former Judge Nap Drops Bombshell About Impeaching Obama

President Obama overstepped the Constitutional bounds of his office by extending a form of amnesty to an untold number of millions of illegal immigrants.

Judge Andrew Napolitano has been speaking about the potential ramifications and consequences of such an action, and he basically says there is “only one option for dealing with it:  Impeachment.

The judge reiterated that view yesterday, speaking with Tom Sullivan on Fox News Radio, ahead of Obama’s announcement.

He said that while Obama does indeed have “prosecutorial discretion”, which allows him to determine the priority of crimes that will or won’t be prosecuted, if such discretion is applied too broadly, as is the case here, it essentially nullifies the law, which is not within the scope of the President’s powers.
“If there are 11 or 12 or 13 million foreign nationals living in the United States illegally, and the President says to half of them, ‘We will not deport you if you do A, B, C, D, and E’, and if he makes up the A, B, C, D, and E, it does not come from the law, he is effectively rewriting the law, or nullifying the law, and that the Constitution doesn’t permit.
As far as the so-called “legal authority” to make such changes to the law that is being claimed by the Obama administration, Napolitano points directly to the contemptible Attorney General Eric Holder, who he says has no credibility.

“You can find a lawyer to justify virtually any position you want.”

“We have laws, they were on the books before he became President of the United States, he knew what those laws were when he took his oath, he knew what those laws were when he swore to uphold them faithfully, he’s violating the oath.”

Impeachment is the only lawful remedy under the Constitution.”

“This is a refusal to enforce the law, this is a rewriting of the law, this is nullification of the law.”
“I think the President has stolen power from the Congress, has imbalanced the relationship between the three branches of government, and that eventually means less personal freedom, because if Barack Obama could get away with this, then ‘fill-in-the-blank’, a President 5, or 10, or 20 years from now could get away with rewriting any law that they want.
Read More@conservative tribune

Flood of illegal immigrants pour into NYC public schools

New York has sent a warning to its schools: Expect more illegal immigrants.
The city Department of Education has told principals it plans this year to enroll 2,350 migrant children from Central America who crossed into the United States unaccompanied — with many more to come.

“It is expected that children will continue to arrive in large numbers in the coming years,” says a DOE memo to principals obtained by The Post.

The notice comes as the city rolls out a $50 million red carpet for 1,662 minors who crossed the border this summer to escape ­violence and gangs in Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador.

In the “surge,” 5,000 of the 63,000 migrant kids caught trying to cross US borders — or who turned themselves in for refuge — have been released to relatives or other “sponsors” in New York state.

Most live with other illegal immigrants.

Read More@NYPost

Call Police “Pigs” – Chicago Based Masked Communists Hand Out Anarchist Flyers To Elementary School Students In North Saint Louis…

…”Students should walk out of school when they hear another murdering pig has gone free”…

Mommy, why did the masked man say we needed to murder a pig?
Early in the Ferguson protesting a group of professional *communists and antagonists from Chicago arrived on scene to exploit the Mike Brown shooting outrage.

within *an article highlighting school closings for Monday and Tuesday in/around the Saint Louis/Ferguson area you find the following disturbing mentions:

[...]  School district representatives from several north St. Louis County districts say they’ve been requested by law enforcement to close for two days immediately after the announcement to keep buses and excess traffic off streets in the event of unrest.
Children in Jennings don’t have bus service. Most of them walk, making Anderson even more concerned for their safety.

On Thursday, Anderson said a group of adults wearing masks and claiming to be from Chicago were passing out fliers to students as they walked home along Cozens Avenue. The street has an elementary school, the junior high and high school.

The fliers were “encouraging students to be disruptive and encouraging them to think of police as pigs,” Anderson said. “That was disturbing.”

Texas Rep. Introduces Bill Nullifying All Federal Gun Control Regulations


Texas state representative Tim Kleinschmidt (shown) introduced a nullification bill that would block the enforcement of unconstitutional federal gun control measures within the sovereign borders of the Lone Star State.
House Bill 176, the Second Amendment Preservation Act, invalidates all attempts by Washington, D.C., to restrict the right to keep and bear arms, as protected by the Second Amendment to the Constitution.
Western Journalism reports that Kleinschmidt’s legislation specifically voids any federal regulation that:
Imposes a tax, fee, or stamp on a firearm, firearm accessory, or firearm ammunition that is not common to all other goods and services and may be reasonably expected to create a chilling effect on the purchase or ownership of those items by a law-abiding citizen;
Requires the registration or tracking of a firearm, firearm accessory, or firearm ammunition or the owners of those items that may be reasonably expected to create a chilling effect on the purchase or ownership of those items by a law-abiding citizen;
Prohibits the possession, ownership, use or transfer of a firearm, firearm accessory, or firearm ammunition by a law-abiding citizen;
Orders the confiscation of a firearm, firearm accessory, or firearm ammunition from a law-abiding citizen.
In the opening paragraphs of the measure, applicable articles from the United States and Texas Constitutions are invoked. The bill reads:
A federal law, including a statute, an executive, administrative, or court order, or a rule, that infringes on a law-abiding citizen’s right to keep and bear arms under the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution or Section 23, Article I, Texas Constitution, is invalid and not enforceable in this state.
HB 176 is another example of a state legislator understanding the role that state lawmakers and governors must play in the effort to maintain the federal behemoth chained securely by the binds of the Constitution. There is, furthermore, a constitutional mandate that state legislators uphold the Constitution.
Read More@New American